I walked around downtown Wednesday morning and visited the Roadrunner station on 1st St. I was carrying the KW Patent Etui plate camera with the Tessar lens and loaded with Arista Edu Ultra 400. I was pleased to see in the pictures that I had gotten a bit better in framing my shots with the camera's wire frame viewfinder. I processed the film with semi-stand development in Rodinal for one hour at 1:100 dilution.
The Rodinal processing gave me tonalities and grain that were not a bad fit with the subject, but I liked my results with this film better with the PMK Pyro developer that I used in my last outing with my other Patent Etui. I have one more roll of the Arista film and I think I'll try it with HC-110 to see how that compares with the Rodinal and PMK processing.
Showing posts with label Arista Edu Ultra 400. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Arista Edu Ultra 400. Show all posts
Thursday, November 14, 2019
Sunday, November 10, 2019
Shooting the Patent Etui
I recently purchased a few rolls of 120-size Arista Edu Ultra 400 to shoot in my medium format cameras. I decided to start off with one of my KW Patent Etui plate cameras with the f4.5/10.5cm Trioplan lens. I shot the roll at 200 ASA with the intent of processing in PMK Pyro. I did not find any guides to using that combination of film and developer, so I looked around at similar combinations for which there were reported results, and I decided to develop for twelve minutes at 24C. I was happy enough with the outcome, but I could also see that my results were not optimal because of the length of time elapsed since I last used the camera.
Accessory roll film holders were available for all the plate cameras; the two most common being the Rada and the Rollex. Because of the thin slots on the back of the Patent Etui, only the Rollex will work with my 6.5x9 KW cameras. While the roll film back did provide a relatively easy way to use commonly available roll film cartridges with the plate cameras, it did also negate the plate camera's compactness to a large degree.
It is possible even today to purchase glass plates for use with the plate film cameras, but the multi-sheet film packs have not been available for decades and cut film is hard to find in the 6.5x9 size. I have so far only used my plate cameras with the roll film adapters.
All of the plate cameras come with three options for viewing the subject to be photographed. The ground glass backs are essential when high precision is required for framing the subject as in close-up work. The need to switch out the film back with the ground glass back makes for a rather awkward and time-consuming process and a sturdy, stable tripod is essential. The little reflex finder and the wire frame finders make hand-held operation possible and are quicker to use, but still require some careful alignment to yield a good result.
I sometimes use the reflex finder and it works, but the image is pretty small and easily obscured if the head is not held precisely in the right position relative to the finder. The bubble level next to the finder is helpful in keeping the image properly angled.
On the Patent Etui a little post is flipped up to use in conjunction with the swing-out wire frame finder. With the round tip of the post properly centered, the wire frame will enclose the portion of the scene which will be recorded on the film. It takes some practice to get good framing with such an arrangement.
So, while good results from any of the plate cameras do require some time and practice to achieve, their features can provide a great deal of versatility and deliver images of excellent quality. Even with relatively simple 3-element uncoated lenses like the Trioplan the big 6.5x9 or 9x12 negatives will provide sharp pictures with a deep range of tonal values. If you need further convincing of the picture-making capacities of the little plate cameras, just take a look at the work Brassai did with his.
* * *
![]() |
| Cottonwoods |
![]() |
| Downtown |
![]() |
| Conservatory |
* * *
Plate cameras were very popular in the 1920s and '30s. All the major manufacturers made them and all had essentially the same set of features, often using the same Compur shutters and Zeiss lenses. The folding plate cameras were very compact compared to other popular styles available in those days and the KW Patent Etui (KAWEE) and the Bentzin Primar were notable for their extremely clever design which allowed them to be folded up and easily slipped into a pocket. When folded, the Patent Etui occupied about the same space as a packet of three plate holders, or a filmpack adapter.Accessory roll film holders were available for all the plate cameras; the two most common being the Rada and the Rollex. Because of the thin slots on the back of the Patent Etui, only the Rollex will work with my 6.5x9 KW cameras. While the roll film back did provide a relatively easy way to use commonly available roll film cartridges with the plate cameras, it did also negate the plate camera's compactness to a large degree.
It is possible even today to purchase glass plates for use with the plate film cameras, but the multi-sheet film packs have not been available for decades and cut film is hard to find in the 6.5x9 size. I have so far only used my plate cameras with the roll film adapters.
All of the plate cameras come with three options for viewing the subject to be photographed. The ground glass backs are essential when high precision is required for framing the subject as in close-up work. The need to switch out the film back with the ground glass back makes for a rather awkward and time-consuming process and a sturdy, stable tripod is essential. The little reflex finder and the wire frame finders make hand-held operation possible and are quicker to use, but still require some careful alignment to yield a good result.
I sometimes use the reflex finder and it works, but the image is pretty small and easily obscured if the head is not held precisely in the right position relative to the finder. The bubble level next to the finder is helpful in keeping the image properly angled.
On the Patent Etui a little post is flipped up to use in conjunction with the swing-out wire frame finder. With the round tip of the post properly centered, the wire frame will enclose the portion of the scene which will be recorded on the film. It takes some practice to get good framing with such an arrangement.
So, while good results from any of the plate cameras do require some time and practice to achieve, their features can provide a great deal of versatility and deliver images of excellent quality. Even with relatively simple 3-element uncoated lenses like the Trioplan the big 6.5x9 or 9x12 negatives will provide sharp pictures with a deep range of tonal values. If you need further convincing of the picture-making capacities of the little plate cameras, just take a look at the work Brassai did with his.
Monday, August 28, 2017
Complications
My efforts at film splitting to produce 127 from 120 roll film have been complicated by poor results from the film I have been using in the project, Arista Edu Ultra 400. While it seemed a good idea to use cheap film while sorting out my DIY film splitter, the results only made life more difficult.
In the past, I've gotten perfectly fine images from Arista films, usually combined with my favorite all-purpose developer, HC-110, both with dilution "B" and as a stand developer. This time, though, the first roll resulted in images with extreme grain. The next roll had images that were barely discernible.
An on line search turned up quite a few experiences similar to mine with Arista 400. A lot of people showed perfectly fine images made with the film, while others like me reported a mixed bag with inconsistent, sometimes disastrous results. So, when I put in an order this morning for some film, it won't be Arista.
Monday, April 03, 2017
(semi) stand by me
I shot a roll today of Arista Edu Ultra 400 in the Spotmatic and processed it with semi-stand development in hc-110. I thought I might get a little less grain and contrast. I'm not sure the results were that much different from what I would have gotten from my usual hc-110b mixture, but getting any sort of images with just 4ml of developer in 640ml of water does seem impressive. I used a recipe for tri-x semi-stand from hjlphotos on tumblr.
![]() |
| Margaret's new dog, Roxie |
Labels:
Arista Edu Ultra 400,
hc-110,
Pentax Spotmatic,
semi-stand
Saturday, April 01, 2017
Botanical
There are times when I find myself walking around with my camera and not making any pictures. I know then that it is time for a reset as I am not really seeing what is around me. Sometimes, it helps to change cameras, lenses, film or film formats. Deciding to focus on some particular subject matter also can be helpful, and I often end up choosing to look for botanical subjects. I may also jump-start the process by looking at some of the great practitioners of the botanical arts from the past that I particularly like, including Imogen Cunningham and her callas, the simple arrangements of Adolf De Meyer, Blossfeldt, Weston, Mapplethorpe -- there is no shortage of inspiring artists.
These photos were made in the cottonwood forest beside the Rio Grande and at Albuquerque's Botanical Garden.
The only 35mm film I had on hand for my Pentax Spotmatic was Arista Edu Ultra 400; it has nice tonal characteristics, but is a bit grainy for this subject matter. I processed the film in HC-110b.
These photos were made in the cottonwood forest beside the Rio Grande and at Albuquerque's Botanical Garden.
The only 35mm film I had on hand for my Pentax Spotmatic was Arista Edu Ultra 400; it has nice tonal characteristics, but is a bit grainy for this subject matter. I processed the film in HC-110b.
Subscribe to:
Comments (Atom)




















