There is not a lot of information on line about the early Mamiya twin lens reflex cameras and not many examples of pictures made with the cameras. I think the reason for that is that the Mamiya line of cameras underwent very rapid development during the early post-war years and the beginning of the line like my Mamiyaflex II got left behind as photographers discovered the later C-line of tlr cameras with their many innovations and capabilities.
I have not made many pictures with my Mamiyaflex II either, but I hope to remedy that over time. I was initially not very impressed with the camera's performance when I first acquired it at a local garage sale a couple years ago. Since then, though, I've decided that my dissatisfaction with the images from the Mamiyaflex was due more to poor technique on my part rather than any deficiency in the camera. In fact, the camera's feature set is quite competitive with others of the period; it has auto frame spacing and shutter cocking coupled to the film advance and a pretty nice pair of coated lenses. I took a walk around Old Town Albuquerque recently with the camera loaded with Kodak Tri-X which I processed in HC-110, semi-stand.
 |
| bicycle shop |
 |
| Grey Dog Trading |
 |
| sculpture garden |
The Mamiyaflex represented an odd detour for the Japanese camera
industry. Before and after WWII, Mamiya mostly followed the industry
trend of producing some very nice copies of German medium-format
cameras. In 1951, however, Mamiya produced a close copy of an American
tlr, the Kodak Reflex. It seems likely the presence of great numbers of
U.S. military personell in the country had an important bearing on the
source of Mamiya's design decision, and it must also have raised some
eyebrows at Kodak. Mamiya also followed Kodak's lead by introducing an
upgraded second model in 1952, the Mamiyaflex II, which incorporated
auto-shutter cocking and and an auto-film advance counter.
Photographers today looking to shoot a medium-format tlr will
particularly appreciate the Mamiya's capacity to accept standard 120
film, as opposed to the now-obsolete 620 Kodak. While shutter operation
and focusing smoothness compare very favorably with Kodak's tlr, the
optics of the Mamiya seem to me to be a little less sharp.
It is not surprising that the Mamiya Sekor lens could not achieve quite the
sharpness of the four-element Kodak Anastar, which was one of the great
lenses of the era. It is a little hard to fathom, though, why Mamiya
did not choose to brighten the screen image of its reflex with the
addition of a Fresnel intensifier as was the case in the Kodak Reflex
II. It may just be that Mamiya saw that the design strategy embodied in
the Reflex II tradition was a dead-end, and that the path to success was
much more likely to point in the direction of new ideas which would be
incorporated in their innovative press cameras and the extraordinary
C-line of twin-lens cameras.
The
Mamiyaflex II Manual is at the Butkus site.