Tuesday, April 22, 2025

W. Eugene Smith

 Unable to sleep one night recently I chose to re-read a 1969 Aperture Monograph about Gene Smith's photography. At the time of that publication, Minor White was still the Aperture Editor and Smith was still seven years from his death at age 67. I was then in my thirties  and actively interested in doing photography, but I don't recall a specific awareness of Smith's importance at that time. And yet, I think of him now as having had a formative influence on how I came to think about photography's importance as an art form.

In spite of that perceptual vacuum on my part, I think the weight of Smith's innovation in developing the photo essay form was inescapable. The graphic power, the intimacy and story-telling depth of his picture essays in the major magazines was unprecedented. In part, his stylistic originality owed something to the times; he began serious work toward the end of the Great Depression, and then dove into a vertiginous career as a chronicler of World War II.

 As a war correspondent Smith worked close to the action with the Marines during the invasions of Saipan, Guam, Iwo Jima, and Okinawa. In that last island battle he was severely wounded and was unable to work during a painful two-year recovery.

Back in photography Smith worked intermittently for the major magazines and also for a time as a member of the Magnum Photos agency.  Smith's post war photography focused seldom on extremes of violence and more on daily life events.  In fact, one of the first pictures he made on regaining enough strength to hold a camera was the famous picture of his two children that appeared in the Family of Man exhibit, The Walk to Paradise Garden.

In spite of the wide recognition of the quality and innovation of Smith's photography during his lifetime, he came to regard much of the war-time work as a failure. That was likely due in part to Smith's setting of standards for himself that  were practically unattainable; he wanted the pictures to contribute substantially to the eradication of war.  Smith's objectives and standards were also not consistent with the realities of publishing in the major news magazines for which he worked.  Editors of the big picture-using publications like Life and Time insisted on pre-scripting story lines, and they never used the photographs in the quantities and manner in which Smith would have done had he enjoyed significant editorial control.
 
On giving further thought to my initial awareness of Smith's work I think it likely was connected to  his photo essay about mercury poisoning through environmental contamination by the Chisso factory around the Japanese fishing village of Minamata. That effort probably produced the most direct change in opinions and behavior of any photographic work accomplished by Smith; it was undertaken with the considerable assistance of the woman he married upon arrival in Minamata in 1971, Aileen Sprague.

Aileen and Gene, credit/copyright: Ishikawa Takeshi

The most impactful of the photographs included in the book produced by Smith and Sprague, Minamata, Words and Photographs,  portrayed a mother cradling her severely deformed daughter in a traditional Japanese bath house.  Ironically, long after Smith's death, Aileen in 1997 withdrew the photo from circulation in accordance with Tomoko's parents' wishes.

-----------------------------

Update:

Thanks to the suggestion of JR Smith I looked around the web for more insights about Gene Smith.  I did not find the video JR had mentioned, but I did come across an interview with James Karales who was a darkroom assitant during the time Smith was working on the Pittsburgh project.

9 comments:

JR Smith said...

I saw a documentary on W. Eugene Smith some years back and it included some footage of him working in his office/darkroom which was a complete and absolute cluttered mess of a space. On the opposite side of this was the studio and darkroom of Ansel Adams, which was well thought out and tidy. To each his own, I guess.

Mike said...

Interesting comparison. My working spaces tend to resemble Smith's more than those of Adams. Maybe that explains my affinity for Smith. I'll look for the video.

kodachromeguy@bellsouth.net said...

As I recall, Smith was severely beaten by company thugs when he was documenting families hurt by the mercury poisoning. Tough guy.

Mike said...

Yes, there is a NY Times interview in which Smith described the incident, saying he was completely blind for a time after the beating and the pain and depression he experienced had him contemplating suicide. In spite of that he rated his condition as secondary to what the people of Minamata had undergone.

mfophotos said...

Oh, Eugene Smith was amazing photographer and frustrating in so many ways. If you haven't seen it yet, do rent the movie Minamata, where Johnny Depp wonderfully portrays Smith. I once had the book "W. Eugene Smith- Master of the Photographic Essay", signed by John G. Morris, which I bought at a book sale for $50. I later gave it to a friend as a gift. Now they sell for over $500!

Mike said...

Thanks for the reminder about the film. I almost never go to see films in theaters, but that one might get me there.

Mike said...

It turns out that the film, Minamata, is available through the Hoopla site which can be accessed at no cost through our local library.

JR Smith said...

Your post inspired me to watch the Johnny Depp film last night. Very well done and the designers did a great job recreating the workshop/darkroom that I recall from the earlier piece I saw and mentioned in my first comment here.

Mike said...

Definitely worthwhile for people unfamiliar with Smith's work. A bit disappointing in terms of understanding the innovations in the photo essay form which he brought to the craft. I suppose the book on which the film was based tells the story more completely, though I have not found it in our library, and at 75 bucks for a used copy I'm not optimistic about getting a copy. The Aperture monograph is a very good overview of Smith's career.