I've been shooting my little Russian Leica-copy again, the Fed-1g.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bbe82/bbe82f68ed6f85a9da633f5a0c8cefd2780da378" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/f745e/f745ea4c0ba97b3ef1b1b11197a9b30641973e31" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a1aa9/a1aa985882532b1abe1560530ec3f893bc35013f" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/d3cdb/d3cdba61404a415ae6c6e8e72aba3c852d023d71" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/f89de/f89de80bdb458b05cb2051a75bd266997db4f17c" alt=""
I had put the camera aside because of some poor results. Thinking it over, I decided there were a lot of variables beyond the camera in making images. In fact, it turned out that my results were mostly from poor film processing technique and a bad 35mm film scanner. I put a new roll of TMAX 100 film in the camera, then changed to tried-and-true chemistry: Rodinal at 1:50 dilution. The Scan-Dual IV scanner went in the trash. The resultant images look pretty good to my eye; of course, much of that is due to the extraordinary Elmar-copy Fed lens.
There is one remaining issue with the camera. It looks like the tension on one of the shutter curtains is not quite right. The negatives show about a millimeter-wide stripe at one end of the negative. I think I'm going to ignore that for now. The camera is a joy to use.
1 comment:
Those photos came out really well.Especially the cat portrait.I'm really enjoying looking through your site.
Post a Comment