![]() |
La Plaza Vieja |
![]() |
Cervantes in repose |
![]() |
Sawmill Tower |
I got out early on my three-wheeler to beat the heat and that got me to the Sawmill neighborhood just as the Flamenco School was about to open.
![]() |
National Institute of Flemenco |
![]() |
La Plaza Vieja |
![]() |
Cervantes in repose |
![]() |
Sawmill Tower |
I got out early on my three-wheeler to beat the heat and that got me to the Sawmill neighborhood just as the Flamenco School was about to open.
![]() |
National Institute of Flemenco |
I first became aware of photography by birds when I acquired a well-used copy of Pigeon Heroes by Marion B. Cothren, with a copyright date of 1944.
The book's foreward carries impressive credentials:
and here is the relevant passage from Page 14:
This picture is from Page 16:
We always have a few pigeons hanging around our back porch, attracted by spilled birdseed from a feeder there. I haven't yet seen any pigeons toting cameras, but I'll try to pay closer attention.
* * *
Bird photography first took off in 1907 thanks to the efforts of a German pharmacist who had some previous experience with delivering prescriptions using carrier pigeons. His success in this accomplishment was particularly impressive given the fact that the primary photographic medium of the time consisted of glass plates coated with a light-sensitive emulsion. In fact, doubts about the feasibility of such an endeavor resulted in a rejection of the initial patent application. That was overcome by the submission of certified images from the bird-borne cameras.
All the warring parties in both WWI and WWII took an interest in developing the potential of bird photography for intelligence gathering. In the post-war years the CIA developed a pigeon-based program, but the results of that effort remain classified except for a stuffed pigeon with camera in the agency museum.
![]() |
Loose lips sink ships. |
As might be expected, bird photography has been significantly advanced by computerized miniaturization of the photographic gear. That is well-illustrated on Youtube by a BBC production featuring eagles, hawks and falcons outfitted with video cameras which transmit their images by microwave.
All of the above is well-documented in the Pigeon Photography wikipedia article.
Toyo Miyatake, a skilled and successful photographer, was one of ten thousand Japanese-Americans imprisoned during World War II in the Manzanar concentration camp in central California. Anyone of Japanese ancestry was forbidden to possess a camera at the time. Miyatake, however, did manage to include an old shutter and lens among the small amount of belongings his family was allowed to take to the camp.
With the help of other craftsmen among the camp's prisoners Miyatake put together a wooden bodied camera from found materials, including a piece of drain pipe to which the shutter and lens were attached to allow focusing. Film holders, a ground glass, film and processing chemicals were smuggled in. When it was all assembled, Miyatake set about surreptitiously recording the daily life of the Manzanar community in a body of work ultimately comprising over a thousand images.
![]() |
Toyo Miyatake, High school students on school grounds, Eastern Sierras and barracks in background, ca. 1942–45 (Aperture #251) |
Miyatake's story was nicely told in a 2023 article by Ken Chen in the #251 edition of Aperture. There are also numerous videos available on the subject, including Episode 3 of the 10 Camps, 10 Stories series on Youtube. There is a PBS short featuring Miyatake's son, How Tōyō Miyatake Handcrafted His Camera in Manzanar.
In fact, Miyatake's story has been told many times over the years, but it seems that it needs retelling even more these days.
![]() |
Toyo Miyatake (portrait by Ansel Adams) |
* * *
The history of WWII Japanese Internment is documented with great thoroughness at the Densho site. See, for instance, Manzanar Children’s Village: Japanese American Orphans in a WWII Concentration Camp.
![]() |
Carl Van Vechten-1934 |
Celebrity photography has never held much interest for me, but the sheer volume of Van Vechten's accomplishment demands attention. He managed for several decades to make portraits of just about anyone who achieved fame on stage, in films or in recordings, often as they were just beginning their careers. Here are four by Van Vechten on the way up in the 1940s and '50s at Wikipedia:
![]() |
Harry Belafonte |
![]() |
Marlon Brando |
![]() |
Truman Capote |
![]() |
Lena Horne |
There are many big collections of Van Vechten's work in museums and university archives; the Library of Congress houses 1,388 of his portraits. The biography page on the LOC site also contains some information about Van Vechten's gear and techniques:
In the early 1930s, Miguel Covarrubias introduced Van Vechten to the 35mm Leica camera. He began photographing his large circle of friends and acquaintances. His earlier career as a writer and his wife's experience as an actress provided him with access to both fledgling artists and the established cultural figures of the time. Some of his subjects from this period include F. Scott Fitzgerald, Langston Hughes, Alfred A. Knopf, Bessie Smith, and Gertrude Stein.
Van Vechten's portraits are frequently busts or half-length poses, in front of bold backdrops. Dancers were usually photographed on stage. Van Vechten did his own darkroom work, but frequently used an assistant to help set up lights for the portrait sittings.
* * *
![]() |
Miguel and Rose |
Rosa was a skilled photographer and it is apparent in the portraits she made - especially those of her friend Frida Kahlo - that she had a talent for making people feel comfortable in front of her camera.
Rosa Rolanda's charm and performance skills frequently put her in front of the cameras of some of the most highly regarded photographers of the time, including Man Ray, Steichen, and Weston.
![]() |
by Man Ray |
![]() |
by Edward Steichen |
![]() |
by Edward Weston |
I always thought the picture by Weston was one of the best he ever made, and I was pleasantly surprised to discover that the sitter was Rosa Rolanda. Now, I am looking forward to getting to know her photography.
![]() |
Rose Covarrubias with Leica (World-Telegram staff photo) |
A leftie? I don't think so. I am pretty sure this shot has been flipped left to right based on the watch and the index finger poised over the topdeck shutter release. Also, with the left eye looking through the finder, the nose would be completely behind the camera body. (World-Telegram staff photo)
These pictures are part of the exhibit about Albuquerque's Special Collections Library. They are printed from a large group of negatives in the Albuquerque Museum Photo Archives.
What is your guess?
An article in the New York Times about an exhibition of the work of Julia Margaret Cameron at the Morgan Library & Museum was a nice excuse to look again at her work. The reviewer is Arthur Lebow, who wrote an exhaustive biography of Diane Arbus.
I only watched a bit of this PBS Masterpiece episode, but the beginning was interesting.
The scene shifted around quickly and I had some difficulty identifying the camera. When she advanced the film and cocked the shutter with that lever, though, it was clearly revealed as a Zeiss Ikon Tenax I.
From Wikipedia:
The Tenax I is a 24x24 mm fixed lens camera by Zeiss Ikon launched in 1939.
The Tenax I was actually launched after the Tenax II. Like the Tenax II, it is a 24×24mm square-format camera taking over 50 exposures on a standard 135 film (35 mm), with a rapid-advance lever next to the lens. But it is a much simpler camera, with a completely different body, no rangefinder, a simple folding viewfinder on the top plate, and a Compur leaf shutter to 1/300". Most of them are equipped with a Zeiss Novar 3.5 cm f/3.5 lens. A smaller number have a Carl Zeiss Jena 3.5 cm f/2.8 Tessar.
Production began in 1938, and it was nearly halted in 1941. There was limited production during the rest of the war.